A day at Dakshineswar
(Henceforth Shri Ramkrishna will be spoken of as Thakur” when required as it is so done in the Gospel )
March 1, 1885
574. “Let a cup that contained garlic be washed
as many times as possible, but the smell lingers yet”.
Cup –
Cerebrum.
Garlic –
evil propensities.
Washed –
Life Power goes into the seventh plane and gets it purified.
Smell
lingers – Life Power comes down and the evil propensities revive. Only in
Nirvija Samadhi the evil propensities are burnt down. But it is seldom attained
by a man.
Yes, in
Individualism so much peculiarities and specialties are required and must be
observed. In other words, it creates aristocrats (of course, a false one) in
religion. Whereas, in Universalism there is no bar; if the Himalayas stand on
the way, it is removed by the grace of God and it happens spontaneously.
Rajayoga
carries this operation and it works like a miracle but at the same time it
expresses the perfection of the experiences in an individual life otherwise no
Universalism will follow.
Rajayoga
operates spontaneously. Nothing can bar a man to eat the mango.
575. “The house-holder devotees, by themselves,
form a class. They desire Yoga (transformation of Life Power) and Bhoga
(worldly enjoyments)”.
Here
also the same old tune in the chord – the peculiarities of the Individualism –
the distinction between a house-holder and a Sannyasi. Yes, it had its origin
in the non-Aryan religion, afterwards came to be known as Jainism, and Buddhism
though discarded it (the self-mortification of Jainism) almost in every point
but created the Sramans (afterwards Sannyasi in the Hinduism). They (Buddhists)
made a clear cut distinction between a Sraman and a layman. Even they went so
far as to codify that the only and sole duty of the layman is to feed the
Sramans. Afterwards from Sankar down to Sri Ramkrishna, we find, the same
distinction is advocated and entertained. Non-Aryanism, Buddhism and Hinduism,
all of them strenuously urge this Sannyas but in the eternal religion, Sanantan
Dharma, of the Aryans we do not find such distinction or institution. With the
Aryans it was spontaneous manifestation of the Life Power, but in the
subsequent religions which flourished in India, nay, in the world abroad, it is but by
self-exertion; such is Individualism. But in Universalism no distinction is
entertained. Everybody sees ‘Diamond’ within him. There is neither a
house-holder devotee nor any Sannyasi. All that is required is a human body and
having seen ‘Diamond’ within, he or she will declare ‘I am one with all’ – the
summum bonum of knowledge doing away any and every distinction between man and
man, establishing eternal peace and Love.
Everybody
claims that his religion is based on love. Where lies its proof? Save and
except some sweet slogans introduced by them, and they have left the burden to
be borne by others with some bulls and bulletins – “Do this and do that”. Such
is Individualism. But in the Universalism, we find what a deep love is
entertained. Whosoever has seen ‘Diamond’ within him, his inner Self has been
transformed into the Self of ‘Diamond’, i.e. One of this Oneness which declares
perfectness and love and this is Universal Love. I love myself the best and
utmost and I by my Mahayoga get others transformed into me only spiritually so
evincing that I love him as I love myself.
To quote
the metaphor of Patanjali that there is only one moon in the sky and
innumerable tanks are there on the earth. The reflected moon is in every tank.
The reflected moon gets the attributes of the moon in the sky.
I am Swapna Siddha but to my personal knowledge and astonishment all those who have seen me within them have also become Swapna Siddha and it is to run as long as I live.
I am Swapna Siddha but to my personal knowledge and astonishment all those who have seen me within them have also become Swapna Siddha and it is to run as long as I live.
No comments:
Post a Comment